Yeah Harriton will definitely take a hard hit this yearUnome wrote:Seven Lakes that far down? And Harriton still up after losing what many say is their best SO class in several years?breakingankles wrote:1. Troy, by a mile
2. Harriton
3. LASA
4. Clements
5. Solon
6. Seven Lakes
7. Mentor
8. Acton-Boxborough
9. WW-P North
10. Chattahoochee
MIT Invitational
- windu34
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
Re: MIT Invitational
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
-
- Member
- Posts: 12
- Joined: November 15th, 2015, 9:36 pm
- Division: C
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: MIT Invitational
I didn't know Harriton's SO class last year was their best; in that case, they'll probably do worse, maybe around 4th-8th.Unome wrote:Seven Lakes that far down? And Harriton still up after losing what many say is their best SO class in several years?breakingankles wrote:1. Troy, by a mile
2. Harriton
3. LASA
4. Clements
5. Solon
6. Seven Lakes
7. Mentor
8. Acton-Boxborough
9. WW-P North
10. Chattahoochee
I personally don't buy into the hype surrounding Seven Lakes. I don't think they've gotten much better over the past few years and there's other really good teams in Texas too. They've never gotten higher than 5th at MIT, too.
- windu34
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
Re: MIT Invitational
Yes but look at their national placement and recent invitational placements show them way over LASA. I remember one kid from Seven lakes at nationals who placed in 5ish events. Not sure if hes still on the team...breakingankles wrote:I didn't know Harriton's SO class last year was their best; in that case, they'll probably do worse, maybe around 4th-8th.Unome wrote:Seven Lakes that far down? And Harriton still up after losing what many say is their best SO class in several years?breakingankles wrote:1. Troy, by a mile
2. Harriton
3. LASA
4. Clements
5. Solon
6. Seven Lakes
7. Mentor
8. Acton-Boxborough
9. WW-P North
10. Chattahoochee
I personally don't buy into the hype surrounding Seven Lakes. I don't think they've gotten much better over the past few years and there's other really good teams in Texas too. They've never gotten higher than 5th at MIT, too.
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
-
- Member
- Posts: 283
- Joined: January 21st, 2016, 6:16 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: MIT Invitational
To be completely honest these are mostly complete guesseswindu34 wrote:How is Troy doing post-nationals? I honestly have no idea where they stand right now.kenniky wrote:Predictions:
1. Troy
2. Seven Lakes
3. LASA
4. Harriton
5. Mentor
6. Solon
7. Clements
8. Acton-Boxborough
9. WW-P North
10. Chattahoochee
however, Troy is Troy, so I don't think it's too much of a gamble to place them 1st
Automated Event Assigner!
UMich 2018: Chem Lab, Fermi [url=http://tinyurl.com/kenniky-so-test]Rate my tests![/url]
[url]https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Kenniky[/url] [url=https://scioly.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=10008&start=34]2017 Nats = rip[/url] [url=https://youtu.be/MCo8IAovjfw]ABRHS 2016[/url]
- Fluorine
- Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: March 29th, 2015, 2:29 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: MIT Invitational
I remember LASA was there too fyiwindu34 wrote:I know Archimedean and Chattahoochee were there in addition to us (Boca Raton)Unome wrote: Yeah, day before was what I was thinking too (plus that means grads who are working events or tournament stuff can come too). I assume you're talking about the Marriott to the northeast of campus; how many teams actually stay there? I only remember four last year.
Alumni of FAUHS SO | Logistics Direcotor @ Cornell Scioly
Wind Power, Anatomy, Invasive Species, Materials Science, Optics, Entomology, Cell Biology, Fossils, Experimental Design, Protein Modeling
- Fluorine
- Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: March 29th, 2015, 2:29 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: MIT Invitational
On campus then sounds doable then. Would just have to designate an area/time unless Luo has someone particularUnome wrote:Yeah, that's what I usually do too.windu34 wrote:We don't go on tours, but we go to the campus to visit all of our event rooms/sites to get accustomed to location and schedule so there is less chance of getting lost and not getting to events on timeUnome wrote: We did a tour last year, although I don't think I went (I usually don't).
Alumni of FAUHS SO | Logistics Direcotor @ Cornell Scioly
Wind Power, Anatomy, Invasive Species, Materials Science, Optics, Entomology, Cell Biology, Fossils, Experimental Design, Protein Modeling
-
- Member
- Posts: 12
- Joined: November 15th, 2015, 9:36 pm
- Division: C
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: MIT Invitational
LASA never takes any of these early invitationals seriously (and Clements doesn't either) which is why Seven Lakes appears to be doing well this year. And teams can get worse, too: LASA went from 3rd at nationals (which is what Seven Lakes got last year) to 9th place the year after.windu34 wrote:Yes but look at their national placement and recent invitational placements show them way over LASA. I remember one kid from Seven lakes at nationals who placed in 5ish events. Not sure if hes still on the team...breakingankles wrote:I didn't know Harriton's SO class last year was their best; in that case, they'll probably do worse, maybe around 4th-8th.Unome wrote: Seven Lakes that far down? And Harriton still up after losing what many say is their best SO class in several years?
I personally don't buy into the hype surrounding Seven Lakes. I don't think they've gotten much better over the past few years and there's other really good teams in Texas too. They've never gotten higher than 5th at MIT, too.
There's no doubt that there's a lot of smart people there; I just don't see them doing that well
-
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 507
- Joined: March 21st, 2011, 1:31 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: MIT Invitational
I think that the Forbes Family Cafe on the 1st floor of the Stata Center (building 32) would be ideal for this -- it's a large space with tables and chairs in a nice building, relatively close to the Marriott hotel and the Kendall T stop. (The cafe is only open for weekday lunches, so it's just a large seating area with tables and chairs at any other time.) Unfortunately, on evenings and weekends the building is only accessible with an MIT ID, so if the meetup is at those times you might have to tail someone in and then have someone open the door for people. That might prove too inconvenient since you guys don't have MIT ID cards.Unome wrote:Since you're here, do you know of any good locations for the meetup? (I barely remember anything about the campus, plus don't want to plan for someplace that turns out to be in use)Luo wrote:I'm sorry for my absence. I'm not directly involved with the tournament this year, so I'm not necessarily immediately in the loop when the website is updated or decisions are made. Stephen and Katie are doing an excellent job. Wishing you all a happy new year, and best of luck and skill at the tournament.Unome wrote:Since Luo seems to have disappeared
A good publicly-accessible alternative would be the lounge (pictured here: http://news.mit.edu/2006/lounge-0920) adjacent to Lobby 10 (the 1st floor lobby of building 10, also known as Memorial Lobby). It's smaller but has comfy green furniture. MIT students refer to it as the "green lounge" (not to be confused with the Ida Green Lounge, which is something else) or, less commonly, the "dollar bill lounge" (because the glass wall of the lounge has a large image of a dollar bill etched into it). If you ask any MIT student where the "green lounge next to lobby 10" is they'll definitely know. MIT students love to take power naps there during the school year. Sometimes there are a few random people sitting in there, but it's decidedly a public place meant for impromptu gatherings, so a scioly.org meetup wouldn't be a problem.
I love MIT.
Proud alumnus of Mounds View High School Science Olympiad, Arden Hills, MN
Co-founder of the MIT Science Olympiad Invitational Tournament: http://scioly.mit.edu/
Co-founder of the MIT Science Olympiad Invitational Tournament: http://scioly.mit.edu/
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4342
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 239 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: MIT Invitational
Usually I'd agree, but I'm leaning towards following the trend from Beckendorff (and windu assuming we're thinking of the same person, he's still around).breakingankles wrote:LASA never takes any of these early invitationals seriously (and Clements doesn't either) which is why Seven Lakes appears to be doing well this year. And teams can get worse, too: LASA went from 3rd at nationals (which is what Seven Lakes got last year) to 9th place the year after.windu34 wrote:Yes but look at their national placement and recent invitational placements show them way over LASA. I remember one kid from Seven lakes at nationals who placed in 5ish events. Not sure if hes still on the team...breakingankles wrote:
I didn't know Harriton's SO class last year was their best; in that case, they'll probably do worse, maybe around 4th-8th.
I personally don't buy into the hype surrounding Seven Lakes. I don't think they've gotten much better over the past few years and there's other really good teams in Texas too. They've never gotten higher than 5th at MIT, too.
There's no doubt that there's a lot of smart people there; I just don't see them doing that well
The second location Luo mentioned sounds pretty good; easy to get to and pretty centrally located on the campus (and we don't have to spend effort getting in). How about Friday at 7:30 PM, or something like that?Fluorine wrote:On campus then sounds doable then. Would just have to designate an area/time unless Luo has someone particularUnome wrote:Yeah, that's what I usually do too.windu34 wrote: We don't go on tours, but we go to the campus to visit all of our event rooms/sites to get accustomed to location and schedule so there is less chance of getting lost and not getting to events on time
-
- Member
- Posts: 107
- Joined: October 17th, 2014, 8:49 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: MIT Invitational
I don't really know about Clements, but Beckendorff has been good for quite a while now (and unfortunately, Kealing hasn't been that great) but there's still quite some variation between LASA and SL's placements (also the fact that LASA beat SL at MIT last year, even though SL ended up doing better at nats). Thus I don't think that Div B performance is necessarily one of the better ways to judge the eventual Div C performance.Unome wrote: Usually I'd agree, but I'm leaning towards following the trend from Beckendorff (and windu assuming we're thinking of the same person, he's still around).
UT Austin '19
Liberal Arts and Science Academy '15
Liberal Arts and Science Academy '15
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests