PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Locked
4Head
Member
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: November 14th, 2016, 11:29 am
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by 4Head »

Raleway wrote:
4Head wrote:
Raleway wrote:
Troy A was above 3000
Without bonus, and from what we heard, the tower was 4.6g
I thought that tower was the Troy B team tower?
Oh yeah that might be right. I didn't ask.
2019 Sounds of Music National Champion
KSSOISLIT
Member
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: April 18th, 2016, 10:03 am
Division: C
State: KS
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by KSSOISLIT »

JonB wrote:It was not Mason, but it was a team that did finish in the top six in the event.
The team was Montgomery (not sure if it was A or B) and they placed either 2nd or 3rd.
Olathe North High School
[b]Past Events:[/b] Anatomy, Bridges, Crime Busters, ELG, Helicopters, Mission Possible, Towers
[b]2019 Events:[/b] Boom, Fermi, Forensics, Protein, Wright Stuff
yoliu
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: January 13th, 2013, 7:53 pm
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by yoliu »

Alex-RCHS wrote:
Bob Miller wrote:<deleted>
But did they really hold only the loading block?
If a team's tower only holds the Loading Block, based on the rules, it really should be tier 4.
rule 6.b says: The Load Score is the measured load supported, including the Loading Block Assembly, bucket and sand, but may not exceed 15,000 g. The lowest Load Scored is the mass of the Loading Block Assembly.

Note that it says Loading Block Assembly, not Loading Block.

5.b says:
The Loading Block Assembly must consist of:i.asquare Loading Block measuring 5 cm x 5 cm x approximately 2 cm high with a hole no larger than 8 mm drilled in the center of the 5 cm x 5 cm faces for a ¼” threaded eyeboltii.¼” threaded eyebolt (1” nominal eye outside diameter), no longer than 3”, and a ¼” wing nutiii.achain and S-hook that are suspended from the Loading Block


Unless your tower can hold the entire assembly, which is way more than a tiny loading block (assuming it is wood), it really should have no score. If you have no load score, you have no bonus, and the score is 0 or tier 4.
Now, it also means you must put the chain and S hook through the tower, and the chain can be heavy or light.

if a tower can accomplish all that, it would be tier 1 and meet the rules (let's set aside the spirit of the rules). If not, it should be tier 4 (or at least score of 0)

just my 2c, what you all think?

thanks
Raleway
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 228
Joined: March 12th, 2017, 7:19 pm
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by Raleway »

yoliu wrote:
Alex-RCHS wrote:
Bob Miller wrote:<deleted>
But did they really hold only the loading block?
If a team's tower only holds the Loading Block, based on the rules, it really should be tier 4.
rule 6.b says: The Load Score is the measured load supported, including the Loading Block Assembly, bucket and sand, but may not exceed 15,000 g. The lowest Load Scored is the mass of the Loading Block Assembly.

Note that it says Loading Block Assembly, not Loading Block.

5.b says:
The Loading Block Assembly must consist of:i.asquare Loading Block measuring 5 cm x 5 cm x approximately 2 cm high with a hole no larger than 8 mm drilled in the center of the 5 cm x 5 cm faces for a ¼” threaded eyeboltii.¼” threaded eyebolt (1” nominal eye outside diameter), no longer than 3”, and a ¼” wing nutiii.achain and S-hook that are suspended from the Loading Block


Unless your tower can hold the entire assembly, which is way more than a tiny loading block (assuming it is wood), it really should have no score. If you have no load score, you have no bonus, and the score is 0 or tier 4.
Now, it also means you must put the chain and S hook through the tower, and the chain can be heavy or light.

if a tower can accomplish all that, it would be tier 1 and meet the rules (let's set aside the spirit of the rules). If not, it should be tier 4 (or at least score of 0)

just my 2c, what you all think?

thanks
MIT would not make an error in rules like that. I'm sure they went through the rules very, very thoroughly and thus it should have held all of its adequate parts.
Sleep is for the week; one only needs it once a week :!: :geek: :roll: :?: :idea:

God bless Len Joeris | Balsaman
Chameleon02
Member
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: January 7th, 2017, 1:54 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by Chameleon02 »

Getting deeper into the season, I am interested in the best scores people are getting for C towers. My high scores are in the 1700s, frustrating my efforts of breaking 2k. In most invites I have been to, this has been enough for a medal but we will see at Umich.
Last&SeventhYearSciolyer
2020 Events: Boomilever, Wright Stuff, Protein, Chem lab, Gravvy
The Air Trajectory nostalgia hits hard
User avatar
John Richardsim
Wiki/Gallery Moderator Emeritus
Wiki/Gallery Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 739
Joined: February 26th, 2014, 10:54 am
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by John Richardsim »

Chameleon02 wrote:Getting deeper into the season, I am interested in the best scores people are getting for C towers. My high scores are in the 1700s, frustrating my efforts of breaking 2k. In most invites I have been to, this has been enough for a medal but we will see at Umich.
1700s would have been first at the West Ottawa invite and 8th at Solon.
nnaya
Member
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: February 4th, 2018, 6:15 am
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by nnaya »

Anyone know the medalling tower scores at UPenn yesterday?
User avatar
antoine_ego
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 387
Joined: May 24th, 2016, 5:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: MA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by antoine_ego »

nnaya wrote:Anyone know the medalling tower scores at UPenn yesterday?
On Ezra, they posted the raw scores for Towers.

EDIT: They removed them :(

I remember it was 2245ish.
Last edited by antoine_ego on February 25th, 2018, 1:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rest in Peace Len Joeris
[b]2016 Air Trajectory Nationals - 3rd
2018 Hovercraft Nationals - 6th
2018 Mousetrap Nationals - 6th
2018 Nationals - Team 9th Place!
2019 Astronomy Nationals - 3rd!
2019 Nationals - Team 9th Place!
[/b]
Acton-Boxborough Regional High School Captain 17-19
User avatar
Longivitis
Member
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: February 17th, 2018, 7:19 am
Division: Grad
State: TX
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 45 times
Contact:

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by Longivitis »

Cy Fair Districts @ Texas
Mass = 8.14 g
Load = 3850g + 5000g bonus = 8850 g
Score = 1087

Base broke first, so I guess I have to focus on getting the base even because it was slightly off when I was setting it up.

Managed to net 3rd place, but most of the schools there did not try with their towers...
University of Texas at Austin '23
Cypress Lakes High School '19

Chemistry Lab, Codebusters, Game On, Science Word, Towers, We've Got Your Number
scioly2345
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: April 23rd, 2017, 7:20 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!

Post by scioly2345 »

Western Long Island Regionals (NY)
Tower Weight- 5.6g
Held- 5.6kg + 5kg bonus
Score-1892
Place- 1st :)
2016-2019 Brother Joseph Fox Latin School
2020-2022 Kellenberg Memorial High School
2022 events - Bridge, Write It Do It, Wright Stuff
God Bless and Rest In Peace Len Joeris (Balsa Man)
“for the betterment of science”
Locked

Return to “Towers B/C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests