Best Times

Locked
Rêveur
Member
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: December 26th, 2017, 10:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Best Times

Post by Rêveur »

A topic stream dedicated to posting best times both personal and observed at tournaments.
User avatar
Alex-RCHS
Member
Member
Posts: 539
Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
Division: Grad
State: NC
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Best Times

Post by Alex-RCHS »

Anyone know best scores at MIT?
About me!
Raleigh Charter HS (NC) 2018
UNC-Chapel Hill 2022
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4342
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 239 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Best Times

Post by Unome »

Alex-RCHS wrote:Anyone know best scores at MIT?
2 minute chinook with all bonuses was probably necessary to medal. I hear a team got over 3 minutes with a chinook.
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Best Times

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

Unome wrote:
Alex-RCHS wrote:Anyone know best scores at MIT?
2 minute chinook with all bonuses was probably necessary to medal. I hear a team got over 3 minutes with a chinook.
2 min chinook was not enough to medal
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
technoal9
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: January 21st, 2018, 5:52 pm
Division: C
State: MA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Best Times

Post by technoal9 »

ScottMaurer19 wrote:
Unome wrote:
Alex-RCHS wrote:Anyone know best scores at MIT?
2 minute chinook with all bonuses was probably necessary to medal. I hear a team got over 3 minutes with a chinook.
2 min chinook was not enough to medal
I placed 17th at MIT with a 1 minute homemade chinook flight ,just to give a reference to the competition that we faced. Though in general, most teams that competed didn't go for the bonus, which was really surprising. I think that we were one of the last teams in the rankings using chinook. Not sure how prevalent FF chinook kit was in the competition and how it performed for other teams. The other team that came with us had one capable of a minute and a half of flight time, but I'm not sure about the full potential of the kit.
Last edited by technoal9 on January 23rd, 2018, 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rêveur
Member
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: December 26th, 2017, 10:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Best Times

Post by Rêveur »

technoal9 wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote:
Unome wrote: 2 minute chinook with all bonuses was probably necessary to medal. I hear a team got over 3 minutes with a chinook.
2 min chinook was not enough to medal
I placed 17th at MIT with a 1 minute homemade chinook flight , just to give a reference to the competition that we faced. Though in general, most teams that competed didn't go for the bonus, which was really surprising. I think that we were one of the last teams in the rankings using chinook. Not sure how prevalent FF chinook kit was in the competition and how it performed for other teams. The other team that came with us had one capable of a minute and a half of flight time, but I'm not sure about the full potential of the kit.
I'm just curious as to whether the winning time (3 mins) was with a FFM kit
User avatar
Riptide
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 202
Joined: December 4th, 2017, 7:09 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:

Re: Best Times

Post by Riptide »

Rêveur wrote:
technoal9 wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote: 2 min chinook was not enough to medal
I placed 17th at MIT with a 1 minute homemade chinook flight , just to give a reference to the competition that we faced. Though in general, most teams that competed didn't go for the bonus, which was really surprising. I think that we were one of the last teams in the rankings using chinook. Not sure how prevalent FF chinook kit was in the competition and how it performed for other teams. The other team that came with us had one capable of a minute and a half of flight time, but I'm not sure about the full potential of the kit.
I'm just curious as to whether the winning time (3 mins) was with a FFM kit
Im fairly certain all of the top teams had FFM kits, although modifications were most likely made. From what I’ve heard, even 6th place (Eagle Independent) had around a 3 minute raw time.

EDIT: Eagle did not get 3 minutes, but were pretty close with around a 2:40 time.
UC Berkeley
Seven Lakes High School '19
Rêveur
Member
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: December 26th, 2017, 10:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Best Times

Post by Rêveur »

Anyone know of the winning time at GGSO?
seadog
Member
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: November 19th, 2013, 12:21 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Best Times

Post by seadog »

I dont know about GGSO but I am pretty sure the winning time at YUSO was 2:10
Last edited by seadog on January 29th, 2018, 12:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
shrewdPanther46
Member
Member
Posts: 438
Joined: October 9th, 2017, 6:25 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0

Re: Best Times

Post by shrewdPanther46 »

seadog wrote:I dont know about GGSO but I am pretty sure the winning time at YUSO was 2:10
Thats really good
Last edited by shrewdPanther46 on January 29th, 2018, 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Locked

Return to “Helicopters C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests