Codebusters C

hippo9
Member
Member
Posts: 248
Joined: March 12th, 2018, 9:35 am
Division: C
State: IN

Re: Codebusters C

Postby hippo9 » October 18th, 2018, 4:18 pm

On the same topic, I'd assume that would be true also for any affine ciphers (although that might be harder to ensure) because they are also just monoalphabetic substitutions.
Last edited by hippo9 on October 18th, 2018, 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn’t be called research." - Albert Einstein

2018: Battery Buggy, Road Scholar, Roller Coaster
2019: Chemistry Lab, Codebusters, Disease Detectives, Fossils, Geologic Mapping, Sounds of Music

User avatar
Name
Member
Member
Posts: 296
Joined: January 21st, 2018, 4:41 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Location: Syosset

Re: Codebusters C

Postby Name » October 18th, 2018, 5:06 pm

On the same topic, I'd assume that would be true also for any affine cipher's (although that might be harder to ensure) because they are also just monoalphabetic substitutions.
Rule g only states aristocrats, patristocrats, and xenocrypts
Affine is a math based cipher, and the point of it is to know the math, not to treat it as a monoaplhabetic. There's no reason why a letter shouldn't encrypt onto itself.
South Woods MS/Syosset HS
Favorite Past Events: Microbe, Invasive, Matsci, Fermi
Events!: Astro, Code, hopefully Fossils

"The more cheese, the more holes. The more holes the less cheese. Therefore the more cheese, the less cheese."

User avatar
megrimlockawesom
Member
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: October 14th, 2017, 5:44 pm
Division: C
State: NC

Re: Codebusters C

Postby megrimlockawesom » October 19th, 2018, 3:48 am

can someone explain to me multiplicative inverse with euclidean algorithm? I have been able to get most of the affine cipher except for this bit.
Ok this is epic 8-)
Events 2018: Battery Buggy (3rd at Nats), Rollercoaster (18th at Nats), Ping Pong (1st at states)
Events 2019: Codebusters, Ping Pong Parachute, Thermodynamics

I like Overwatch, Marvel, and food

Bottom Text

UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1518
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
Division: C
State: PA

Re: Codebusters C

Postby UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F » October 19th, 2018, 4:34 pm

can someone explain to me multiplicative inverse with euclidean algorithm? I have been able to get most of the affine cipher except for this bit.
Sure!

Suppose you want to find the multiplicative inverse of 8 modulus 27.

(Little math side note: this is a solution for x in the Diophantine equation )

We proceed by using the regular Euclidean algorithm:
Divide 27 by 8.

Divide 8 by 3.

Divide 5 by 3.

Divide 3 by 2.

Now that we have a 1 at the end, we can proceed to the extended Euclidean algorithm. First, rearrange the equations.
Equation 1:
Equation 2:
Equation 3:
Equation 4:
Now.. we can substitute equation 3 into equation 4:

And then equation 2:

And then equation 1:

Rearrange a little...

Now, we have solved the Diophantine equation.
Here's the trick: we set the equation modulus 27.




So, the multiplicative inverse of 8 mod 27 is 17.
This won't take nearly as long once you get used to it.

User avatar
Name
Member
Member
Posts: 296
Joined: January 21st, 2018, 4:41 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Location: Syosset

Re: Codebusters C

Postby Name » October 19th, 2018, 8:13 pm

can someone explain to me multiplicative inverse with euclidean algorithm? I have been able to get most of the affine cipher except for this bit.
Sure!

Suppose you want to find the multiplicative inverse of 8 modulus 27.

(Little math side note: this is a solution for x in the Diophantine equation )

We proceed by using the regular Euclidean algorithm:
Divide 27 by 8.

Divide 8 by 3.

Divide 5 by 3.

Divide 3 by 2.

Now that we have a 1 at the end, we can proceed to the extended Euclidean algorithm. First, rearrange the equations.
Equation 1:
Equation 2:
Equation 3:
Equation 4:
Now.. we can substitute equation 3 into equation 4:

And then equation 2:

And then equation 1:

Rearrange a little...

Now, we have solved the Diophantine equation.
Here's the trick: we set the equation modulus 27.




So, the multiplicative inverse of 8 mod 27 is 17.
This won't take nearly as long once you get used to it.

Well honestly I have no idea what you did so here's what I do
(Also generally it's mod 26 not 27)
Let's use 5 as a example
5x = 1mod26
Add 26 to one until it's divisable by 5
1, 27, 53, 79, 105
105 is divisable by 5
105/5 is 21
21 is the mod inverse of 5

Even using UTFs example- 8x=1mod27
1, 28, 55, 82, 109, 136
136/8 is 17
South Woods MS/Syosset HS
Favorite Past Events: Microbe, Invasive, Matsci, Fermi
Events!: Astro, Code, hopefully Fossils

"The more cheese, the more holes. The more holes the less cheese. Therefore the more cheese, the less cheese."

UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1518
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
Division: C
State: PA

Re: Codebusters C

Postby UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F » October 20th, 2018, 10:01 am

can someone explain to me multiplicative inverse with euclidean algorithm? I have been able to get most of the affine cipher except for this bit.
Sure!

Suppose you want to find the multiplicative inverse of 8 modulus 27.

(Little math side note: this is a solution for x in the Diophantine equation )

We proceed by using the regular Euclidean algorithm:
Divide 27 by 8.

Divide 8 by 3.

Divide 5 by 3.

Divide 3 by 2.

Now that we have a 1 at the end, we can proceed to the extended Euclidean algorithm. First, rearrange the equations.
Equation 1:
Equation 2:
Equation 3:
Equation 4:
Now.. we can substitute equation 3 into equation 4:

And then equation 2:

And then equation 1:

Rearrange a little...

Now, we have solved the Diophantine equation.
Here's the trick: we set the equation modulus 27.




So, the multiplicative inverse of 8 mod 27 is 17.
This won't take nearly as long once you get used to it.

Well honestly I have no idea what you did so here's what I do
(Also generally it's mod 26 not 27)
Let's use 5 as a example
5x = 1mod26
Add 26 to one until it's divisable by 5
1, 27, 53, 79, 105
105 is divisable by 5
105/5 is 21
21 is the mod inverse of 5

Even using UTFs example- 8x=1mod27
1, 28, 55, 82, 109, 136
136/8 is 17
That works well with relatively small numbers, but it's very tedious with larger numbers, especially with 4-function calculators. The extended Euclidean algorithm works for much larger numbers, and you can verify that you didn't make any mistakes along the way just by testing your latest equation.

For more information about the extended Euclidean algorithm, see http://www-math.ucdenver.edu/~wcherowi/ ... ucalg.html

User avatar
l0lit
Member
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: July 30th, 2018, 12:20 pm
Division: C
State: IN

Re: Codebusters C

Postby l0lit » October 31st, 2018, 6:55 pm

Not a math question,

What do you guys think would be a good score on the timed question? Last year, I believe the nationals winner was sub-2 minutes, but it was a short cipher. Of course, thank goodness it is no longer weighted so heavily.
List of compiled Science Olympiad tests here
* Others coming soon...

mjcox2000
Member
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: May 9th, 2014, 3:34 am
Division: Grad
State: VA

Re: Codebusters C

Postby mjcox2000 » October 31st, 2018, 8:19 pm

Not a math question,

What do you guys think would be a good score on the timed question? Last year, I believe the nationals winner was sub-2 minutes, but it was a short cipher. Of course, thank goodness it is no longer weighted so heavily.
Nationals winner here. We were at 1 minute 51 seconds.

There are pros and cons to heavier weighting for the timed question. On one hand, emphasizing solving the problem quickly means you have to have a firm grasp on what you’re doing in order to do well, so it selects strongly for the best-prepared teams. On the other hand, small mistakes that take time to fix incur huge penalties, and scores on the various test portions can be wildly out of proportion — if I’m not mistaken, my team’s time bonus was greater than the number of available points on the test by a factor of 2 to 3.
MIT ‘23
TJHSST ‘19
Longfellow MS
2019:
Circuit Lab: 1st
Thermodynamics: 2nd
Sounds of Music: 5th
Mission Possible: 6th

2018:
Code Busters (trial): 1st

2015:
Simple Machines: 2nd
SumoBots (trial): 2nd

2014:
WIDI: 2nd
Simple Machines: 3rd

User avatar
drsparc
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: November 2nd, 2014, 1:17 pm
Division: C
State: CA

Re: Codebusters C

Postby drsparc » November 9th, 2018, 7:15 pm

I'm having trouble finding a true 4-function calculator. Most of the simple ones also include percent and/or square root keys. Does anyone know if those are OK for this event?

Jacobi
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 137
Joined: September 4th, 2018, 7:47 am
State: -

Re: Codebusters C

Postby Jacobi » November 10th, 2018, 4:19 pm

I'm having trouble finding a true 4-function calculator. Most of the simple ones also include percent and/or square root keys. Does anyone know if those are OK for this event?
I know that including a sqrt key harms nothing.
I have a feeling that a percent key would be OK.


Return to “2019 Lab Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest