End Task
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: October 4th, 2018, 3:55 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: End Task
Does the actual part of the device that lifts the platform have to be free-standing, or can it be guided?
I'm doing a scissor lift, and its not going as straight up as I would like. Can I have a small wall put in to help guide the lift part up if it never touches the platform or the battery?
I'm doing a scissor lift, and its not going as straight up as I would like. Can I have a small wall put in to help guide the lift part up if it never touches the platform or the battery?
- TheSquaad
- Member
- Posts: 166
- Joined: March 18th, 2017, 5:14 pm
- Division: Grad
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: End Task
From what I read, your lifting mechanism does not have to be freestanding. We’re planning on using rails to guide the superstructure under the platform.C8H10N4O2! wrote:Does the actual part of the device that lifts the platform have to be free-standing, or can it be guided?
I'm doing a scissor lift, and its not going as straight up as I would like. Can I have a small wall put in to help guide the lift part up if it never touches the platform or the battery?
- PM2017
- Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: End Task
I'd like your guys' opinions on this:
Does standard include rechargeable 9v batteries? My rechargeable 9V battery seems to be lighter than my nondischargeable 9v batteries.
Does standard include rechargeable 9v batteries? My rechargeable 9V battery seems to be lighter than my nondischargeable 9v batteries.
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
- CookiePie1
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 428
- Joined: February 15th, 2018, 5:05 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: End Task
Personally, I'd say they are standard, but maybe you should submit an FAQ.PM2017 wrote:I'd like your guys' opinions on this:
Does standard include rechargeable 9v batteries? My rechargeable 9V battery seems to be lighter than my nondischargeable 9v batteries.
South Brunswick High School Captain '22
2020 Events: Protein Modeling, Ping Pong Parachute, Wright Stuff, Sounds of Music
2021 Events: Protein Modeling, Sounds of Music, Ornithology
2022 Events: TBD
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
-Albert Einstein
2020 Events: Protein Modeling, Ping Pong Parachute, Wright Stuff, Sounds of Music
2021 Events: Protein Modeling, Sounds of Music, Ornithology
2022 Events: TBD
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
-Albert Einstein
- TheSquaad
- Member
- Posts: 166
- Joined: March 18th, 2017, 5:14 pm
- Division: Grad
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: End Task
I'd go with the heavier batteries either way. They're less likely to fall.PM2017 wrote:I'd like your guys' opinions on this:
Does standard include rechargeable 9v batteries? My rechargeable 9V battery seems to be lighter than my nondischargeable 9v batteries.
-
- Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: October 8th, 2018, 11:58 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: End Task
The Construction Parameters section letter c states that "Any action in the device not designed to contribute to the completion of the Final Action will not count for points...." Does this mean that you MUST include the Final Action in your device? Or could you possibly make a machine using only the starting action and Scorable Actions?
- PM2017
- Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: End Task
I believe you get tiered if you don't successfully accomplish the final action. Essentially, if you have a start task, all 12 actions, accurate chemical clock and 30x30x30 box, but no final action, you still lose to a team that only has a start task and successful final task.annabelle0308 wrote:The Construction Parameters section letter c states that "Any action in the device not designed to contribute to the completion of the Final Action will not count for points...." Does this mean that you MUST include the Final Action in your device? Or could you possibly make a machine using only the starting action and Scorable Actions?
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
- bearasauras
- Member
- Posts: 410
- Joined: March 4th, 2003, 8:33 pm
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
- Contact:
Re: End Task
I'm trying to find that, do you know which rule states that it would be placed in a lower tier?PM2017 wrote:I believe you get tiered if you don't successfully accomplish the final action. Essentially, if you have a start task, all 12 actions, accurate chemical clock and 30x30x30 box, but no final action, you still lose to a team that only has a start task and successful final task.annabelle0308 wrote:The Construction Parameters section letter c states that "Any action in the device not designed to contribute to the completion of the Final Action will not count for points...." Does this mean that you MUST include the Final Action in your device? Or could you possibly make a machine using only the starting action and Scorable Actions?
-
- Member
- Posts: 592
- Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: End Task
Last year it did, but this year the rules do not state that tiering is a consequence of not following construction parameters as far as I can tell. Instead I think you would just get 0 points for all of your actionsbearasauras wrote:I'm trying to find that, do you know which rule states that it would be placed in a lower tier?PM2017 wrote:I believe you get tiered if you don't successfully accomplish the final action. Essentially, if you have a start task, all 12 actions, accurate chemical clock and 30x30x30 box, but no final action, you still lose to a team that only has a start task and successful final task.annabelle0308 wrote:The Construction Parameters section letter c states that "Any action in the device not designed to contribute to the completion of the Final Action will not count for points...." Does this mean that you MUST include the Final Action in your device? Or could you possibly make a machine using only the starting action and Scorable Actions?
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n): Hydro: 3/5/18 Robot Arm: na/1/1 Rocks: 1/1/1 2018 (r/s/n): Heli: 2/1/7 Herp: 1/4/4 Mission: 1/1/6 Rocks: 1/1/1 Eco: 6/3/9 2019 (r/s/n): Fossils: 1/1/1 GLM: 1/1/1 Herp: 1/1/5 Mission: 1/1/3 WS: 4/1/10 Top 3 Medals: 144 Golds: 80
- windu34
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
Re: End Task
This is by no means official nor does it represent the opinion of any of the organizations that I represent. That said:ScottMaurer19 wrote:Last year it did, but this year the rules do not state that tiering is a consequence of not following construction parameters as far as I can tell. Instead I think you would just get 0 points for all of your actionsbearasauras wrote:I'm trying to find that, do you know which rule states that it would be placed in a lower tier?PM2017 wrote: I believe you get tiered if you don't successfully accomplish the final action. Essentially, if you have a start task, all 12 actions, accurate chemical clock and 30x30x30 box, but no final action, you still lose to a team that only has a start task and successful final task.
I am not so sure these interpretations are correct. 3.c. is stating that "Any action in the device not designed to contribute to the completion of the Final Action will not count for points". I would argue that as long as the team intends to complete the Final Action as shown by the ASL, then they would earn points for all the tasks even if the final task didn't work for some reason. However, if they didnt even "attempt" the final task in their device, then I can see how the argument could be made to not award any points for any of the preceding tasks.
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests