Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

User avatar
dudeincolorado
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 595
Joined: January 31st, 2007, 6:27 pm
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by dudeincolorado »

im confused what happend?
SO stressed!
User avatar
Assasinator
Posting Games Account
Posts: 0
Joined: June 17th, 2008, 8:41 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by Assasinator »

Yes gneissisnice you did say that but look you said your logic is bad so you essentially said that your because was invalid yourself. Without a because statement your accusation can't be accepted. If you had simply just changed your because to something else it would have been accepted. I do commende you though you were able to get kube to panic and hijack the account.
gneissisnice wrote:oh wait, my logic is bad, rocketman1555 was the only one to use the Assassinator one. Though he HAS been eerily quiet during this whole scenario....my apologies starpug, but i'll keep my accusation up anyway, for the heck of it.
This Account has been deactivated. Ignore any posts made from it. If you want to talk to the current Assassinator, send a PM to the Assassinator Account. If you have a complaint about the current Assassinator, PM a former Assassinator such as Skystrider or Rocketman.
User avatar
gneissisnice
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 930
Joined: March 11th, 2008, 9:10 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by gneissisnice »

Sure I had a because statement. It was 'for the heck of it". Thats a good because, right?
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
User avatar
sachleen
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 225
Joined: April 10th, 2007, 8:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by sachleen »

Assasinator wrote:Yes gneissisnice you did say that but look you said your logic is bad so you essentially said that your because was invalid yourself. Without a because statement your accusation can't be accepted. If you had simply just changed your because to something else it would have been accepted. I do commende you though you were able to get kube to panic and hijack the account.
gneissisnice wrote:oh wait, my logic is bad, rocketman1555 was the only one to use the Assassinator one. Though he HAS been eerily quiet during this whole scenario....my apologies starpug, but i'll keep my accusation up anyway, for the heck of it.
ok, dude, you can stop playing it now, they KNOW the secret... :) I didnt 'panic'...
rocketman1555
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 577
Joined: September 10th, 2006, 8:21 am
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by rocketman1555 »

so are we starting another assasination game, or is it over for a while?
I am a practitioner of the art of magic known as science.
User avatar
Assasinator
Posting Games Account
Posts: 0
Joined: June 17th, 2008, 8:41 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by Assasinator »

gneissisnice wrote:Sure I had a because statement. It was 'for the heck of it". Thats a good because, right?
Your being sarcastic I hope because you should know that's not a correct because statement. It's common sense the accusation has to have a good reason behind it not "just cause" or "for the heck of it".
This Account has been deactivated. Ignore any posts made from it. If you want to talk to the current Assassinator, send a PM to the Assassinator Account. If you have a complaint about the current Assassinator, PM a former Assassinator such as Skystrider or Rocketman.
User avatar
gneissisnice
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 930
Joined: March 11th, 2008, 9:10 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by gneissisnice »

Sigh. Nevermind. Anyway, since I got it right, do I get to choose the next assassinator?
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
starpug
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 932
Joined: April 5th, 2008, 6:51 pm
Division: Grad
State: ME
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by starpug »

You didn't get it right :P
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain
User avatar
vofbassist
Member
Member
Posts: 74
Joined: September 2nd, 2008, 12:25 pm
Division: Grad
State: WI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by vofbassist »

so who gets to pick then
User avatar
sachleen
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 225
Joined: April 10th, 2007, 8:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Post by sachleen »

technically, im still an officer.... and i did rat out starpug with a valid because statement, explaining exactly what happened... so... yeah :P

just in case "I ACCUSE STARPUG OF BEING THE ASSASSINATOR BECAUSE I WAS THE PREVIOUS ASSASSINATOR AND I ALWAYS KNEW IT WAS HIM" there :P... i think this game is way beyond over now... lol.. just in case it isn't, i vote that gneissisnice gets to pick the next assassinator.
Post Reply

Return to “Assassinator Games”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests